Don’t point that at me unless you intend to use it on me.

Ministers in the Scottish Government have been urged to “live up to their word” about making the country fairer by outlining how they intend to use new income tax powers, which are now set to be devolved a year earlier than expected.

Intended to be used as a tab inside of a containing TabActivity.

How can I know whether the company name I intend to use has once been used by other companies?

Intent to Use (ITU) Forms | USPTO

All content on this website, including dictionary, thesaurus, literature, geography, and other reference data is for informational purposes only. This information should not be considered complete, up to date, and is not intended to be used in place of a visit, consultation, or advice of a legal, medical, or any other professional.

Trademark Applications - Intent To Use

All content on this website, including dictionary, thesaurus, literature, geography, and other reference data is for informational purposes only. This information should not be considered complete, up to date, and is not intended to be used in place of a visit, consultation, or advice of a legal, medical, or any other professional.

Oscar Madison: Don’t point that finger at me unless you intend to use it.
When filing for a trademark registration, the primarydifference between an actual-use and an intent-to-use application is that whenanswering the first question (What is Your Basis for Filing?), choose “Yes”under Intent to Use. You do not need to supply specimens with an intent-to-useapplication, but you’ll have to include one with your Allegation of Use. Inaddition to the information in this chapter, the USPTO’s help system shouldeasily get you through this form.An intent to use (ITU) is a provided for in Trademark Act §1(b). who have not yet used ( that can be regulated by ) the mark they wish to may file a under this .If you are not yet using your mark, you can wait until youput it into use before filing a trademark application, or you can file anapplication on the grounds that you intend to use it within six months of thedate the mark is approved for registration by the USPTO. If you are unable toput the mark into use within that period, you can purchase additional six-monthextensions, one at a time until three years have passed, if you are able toconvince the USPTO that the reasons for the delays are legitimate. Prior to November 1989, applicants were required to initiate use in commerce of its mark prior to filing a trademark application with the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO). Once the U.S. joined the international Madrid Protocol, though, the USPTO extended potential protection to applicants that wished to file an application before they commenced use of a mark with goods or services in interstate commerce, much like the majority of international trademark systems. Today, a significant number of trademark applicants file “intent to use” (ITU) applications in this manner. The key advantage to filing an ITU application, rather than waiting for use in commerce to begin, is that the applicant receives the benefit of the filing date as their “constructive use” date for purposes of nationwide priority. An ITU application does not mature into a registration, though, until a statement of use is filed and accepted by the USPTO.An "intent to use" application must include a sworn statement (usually in the form of a ) that has a the mark . The applicant or a person authorized to sign on behalf of the applicant must sign the .To meet the “bona fide” intention requirement, the applicant must present evidence of an objective, not merely subjective, good faith intent to use. This standard has been refined after several decisions from the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board. For instance, in Spirits International B.V. v. S.S. Taris Zeytin, 99 U.S.P.Q.2d 1545 (T.T.A.B. 2011), the applicant failed to present any documentary evidence of its intention to use its mark with spirits, stating in an interrogatory response that only olive oil is sold under the mark in the United States. Finding that the opposer had met its initial burden of demonstrating by a preponderance of the evidence that the applicant lacked intent to use on the filing date of the application, it sustained the opposition. Similarly, in Honda Motor Co., Ltd. v. Friedrich Winkelmann, 90 U.S.P.Q.2d 1660 (T.T.A.B. 2009), the applicant failed to provide any responsive documents in discovery to a request for information relating to the applicant’s intent, even stating that “no such documents exist.” Lacking any objective evidence, the Board granted summary judgment for the opposer.
Intent To Use Trademarks Explained - Minott Gore

Intent to Use Trademark Applications - Gerben Law Firm PLLC

There are two main types of trademark applications that may be filed with the USPTO: 1.) a “Use in Commerce” application; and 2.) an “Intent to Use” application.

Intent to Use Trademark Applications | Thomas Law Firm PLLC

Explanation of "Intent to Use" Trademark applications vs

You should also discuss the different methods you intend to use in full detail, and provide justification as to why you have chosen to use these methods. It is also helpful to discuss how many participants you intend to involve in your research, how you intend to find or approach participants, and how they will be used in your study.

Intent To Use - Trademark Attorneys |WebTM

Allegations of Use/Statements of Use – Intent to Use Applications

How can I know whether the company name I intend to use is identical to a name that has been subject to a change of name direction issued by the Registrar of Companies?